<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 390 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187442</link>
    <description>Identification evidence in a night dacoity case must be scrutinised with care, especially where witnesses may already know some accused from nearby villages or a common institution. The omission to name the accused in the first information report weakened the prosecution case, and a test identification parade held about four months after arrest, without explanation for the delay, lost substantial evidentiary value. Although identification evidence is admissible under Section 9 of the Evidence Act, its probative worth depends on a prompt parade that can genuinely test memory and support reliable identification. The identification evidence was found unreliable and insufficient to sustain the conviction; the accused were acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 390 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187442</link>
      <description>Identification evidence in a night dacoity case must be scrutinised with care, especially where witnesses may already know some accused from nearby villages or a common institution. The omission to name the accused in the first information report weakened the prosecution case, and a test identification parade held about four months after arrest, without explanation for the delay, lost substantial evidentiary value. Although identification evidence is admissible under Section 9 of the Evidence Act, its probative worth depends on a prompt parade that can genuinely test memory and support reliable identification. The identification evidence was found unreliable and insufficient to sustain the conviction; the accused were acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>