https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187441 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal and framed a substantial question of law on whether an authorised dealer, having complied with the RBI's Memorandum of Instructions for Full Fledged Money Changer transactions with another authorised dealer under Section 73(3) of FERA, can still be held liable for breach of Section 6(4) and (5) of FERA. The order records that service was waived by the respondent and does not decide the merits of the question. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:27:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187441 The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal and framed a substantial question of law on whether an authorised dealer, having complied with the RBI's Memorandum of Instructions for Full Fledged Money Changer transactions with another authorised dealer under Section 73(3) of FERA, can still be held liable for breach of Section 6(4) and (5) of FERA. The order records that service was waived by the respondent and does not decide the merits of the question. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187441