<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 634 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187435</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to reconsider whether the income from letting out Kalyanamandapam by a charitable trust constituted business income under Section 11(4A) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the amended section retrospectively was deemed incorrect, with the High Court clarifying that the amendment should only apply from 1-4-1992 onwards. The Tribunal was instructed to reevaluate the matter using the appropriate legal tests and consider if the activity was systematically carried out with a profit-making intention. The case was remitted for fresh consideration with the opportunity to introduce new evidence if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 634 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187435</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to reconsider whether the income from letting out Kalyanamandapam by a charitable trust constituted business income under Section 11(4A) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the amended section retrospectively was deemed incorrect, with the High Court clarifying that the amendment should only apply from 1-4-1992 onwards. The Tribunal was instructed to reevaluate the matter using the appropriate legal tests and consider if the activity was systematically carried out with a profit-making intention. The case was remitted for fresh consideration with the opportunity to introduce new evidence if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>