https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187433 An appeal became infructuous because the Settlement Commission passed a fresh order after the High Court's impugned order, and that later order was neither challenged before the High Court nor before the SC. The Court noted that the respondent had complied with the fresh order, leaving no live controversy for adjudication. The appeal was therefore dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187433 An appeal became infructuous because the Settlement Commission passed a fresh order after the High Court's impugned order, and that later order was neither challenged before the High Court nor before the SC. The Court noted that the respondent had complied with the fresh order, leaving no live controversy for adjudication. The appeal was therefore dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187433