<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1226 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187428</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of proceedings for non-payment of Additional Duties of Excise by an E.O.U. was rejected. The court upheld the impugned order based on previous decisions and an Apex Court judgment, finding the issue had already been decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1226 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187428</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of proceedings for non-payment of Additional Duties of Excise by an E.O.U. was rejected. The court upheld the impugned order based on previous decisions and an Apex Court judgment, finding the issue had already been decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>