<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, due to violations of natural justice and legal principles. The case involved disputed central excise duty and penalties for alleged clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for cross-examination and proper appraisal of evidence, directing a fresh assessment by the Original Authority. Both the appellant and Revenue were granted the opportunity to present their cases anew, with all issues left open for reconsideration. The appeals were allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, due to violations of natural justice and legal principles. The case involved disputed central excise duty and penalties for alleged clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need for cross-examination and proper appraisal of evidence, directing a fresh assessment by the Original Authority. Both the appellant and Revenue were granted the opportunity to present their cases anew, with all issues left open for reconsideration. The appeals were allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>