https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333707 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect was low and dismissed it on that ground alone. The substantive question of law raised by the parties was not adjudicated and was expressly left open for future consideration. The document therefore records only a discretionary refusal to hear the matter on the basis of inadequate tax effect, without any ruling on the underlying legal issue. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333707 The Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal because the tax effect was low and dismissed it on that ground alone. The substantive question of law raised by the parties was not adjudicated and was expressly left open for future consideration. The document therefore records only a discretionary refusal to hear the matter on the basis of inadequate tax effect, without any ruling on the underlying legal issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333707