<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 716 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition as the alleged mistake was not apparent from the record and did not meet the criteria for rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining fairness and clarity in tax proceedings by rectifying only manifest errors that cause prejudice to parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 716 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition as the alleged mistake was not apparent from the record and did not meet the criteria for rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining fairness and clarity in tax proceedings by rectifying only manifest errors that cause prejudice to parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>