<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 684 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333664</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner, an Ex-Serviceman running a Security Agency, to pay a sum towards disputed service tax liability to present their case and undergo fresh adjudication. Despite issues with notice delivery, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to submit materials and attend a hearing before the respondent, with instructions to pay a specified sum within a timeframe. Compliance would allow the petitioner to address the service tax liability, reply with relevant documents, and partake in a new adjudication process without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 684 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333664</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner, an Ex-Serviceman running a Security Agency, to pay a sum towards disputed service tax liability to present their case and undergo fresh adjudication. Despite issues with notice delivery, the petitioner was granted the opportunity to submit materials and attend a hearing before the respondent, with instructions to pay a specified sum within a timeframe. Compliance would allow the petitioner to address the service tax liability, reply with relevant documents, and partake in a new adjudication process without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>