<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1138 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187408</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 64/95-C.E. was available for circuit breakers and other electrical items used exclusively in the construction of Indian Navy warships because the prescribed Navy certificate was produced and the end-use condition was satisfied. The notification did not require direct supply to the Indian Navy, so supply through Mazagon Dock Ltd. did not defeat eligibility. A precedent on supplies to shipbuilders under a different entry and on different facts was held inapplicable. The operative principle is that exemption cannot be denied when the notification&#039;s terms, including certification and end-use requirements, are met merely because an intermediary is involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:45:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1138 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187408</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 64/95-C.E. was available for circuit breakers and other electrical items used exclusively in the construction of Indian Navy warships because the prescribed Navy certificate was produced and the end-use condition was satisfied. The notification did not require direct supply to the Indian Navy, so supply through Mazagon Dock Ltd. did not defeat eligibility. A precedent on supplies to shipbuilders under a different entry and on different facts was held inapplicable. The operative principle is that exemption cannot be denied when the notification&#039;s terms, including certification and end-use requirements, are met merely because an intermediary is involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>