<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187414</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the refund to the NPPA was not affected by explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Act for the Assessment Year 1999-2000. The Tribunal&#039;s decision from a prior case was deemed inapplicable as the explanation was not present in the relevant year. The Registry was instructed to notify the Tribunal about the order for future cases, to be heard jointly with another Income Tax Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187414</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the refund to the NPPA was not affected by explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Act for the Assessment Year 1999-2000. The Tribunal&#039;s decision from a prior case was deemed inapplicable as the explanation was not present in the relevant year. The Registry was instructed to notify the Tribunal about the order for future cases, to be heard jointly with another Income Tax Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>