https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187416 The SC refused to reduce the deposit directed by its earlier order and dismissed the request for a lower compliance amount. It also declined to extend the time for making the deposit and dismissed the extension application. The result was that the deposit direction remained unchanged, and the Revenue was left at liberty to proceed against the assessee in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187416 The SC refused to reduce the deposit directed by its earlier order and dismissed the request for a lower compliance amount. It also declined to extend the time for making the deposit and dismissed the extension application. The result was that the deposit direction remained unchanged, and the Revenue was left at liberty to proceed against the assessee in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187416