https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187403 Rule 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules does not create deemed confirmation on expiry of the maximum probation period. The scheme requires a positive order of confirmation and conditions it on fitness for confirmation and passing the prescribed departmental examinations; continued service beyond probation does not, by itself, confer substantive status. The rule also permits dispensation of service if the probationer is found unsuitable or has not passed the examinations. On that basis, termination of probationary judicial officers after the Full Court found them unsuitable for confirmation was upheld as valid. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:07:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187403 Rule 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules does not create deemed confirmation on expiry of the maximum probation period. The scheme requires a positive order of confirmation and conditions it on fitness for confirmation and passing the prescribed departmental examinations; continued service beyond probation does not, by itself, confer substantive status. The rule also permits dispensation of service if the probationer is found unsuitable or has not passed the examinations. On that basis, termination of probationary judicial officers after the Full Court found them unsuitable for confirmation was upheld as valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187403