<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 47 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187402</link>
    <description>In service law, inclusion in an eligibility list does not create a vested right to promotion, continuance in the higher post, or automatic confirmation, because fitness for promotion remains subject to periodic assessment and competent authority approval. Reversion of officiating circle inspectors to their substantive posts, where they had never been confirmed and the action was driven by administrative exigency rather than misconduct, is treated as a non-punitive service reversion and not a reduction in rank. After reorganisation, the State could act on a provisional integrated seniority list and was not confined to regionwise promotions or reversions. Rule 2(c) of the Mysore Seniority Rules was held inapplicable to invalidate the reversion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 47 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187402</link>
      <description>In service law, inclusion in an eligibility list does not create a vested right to promotion, continuance in the higher post, or automatic confirmation, because fitness for promotion remains subject to periodic assessment and competent authority approval. Reversion of officiating circle inspectors to their substantive posts, where they had never been confirmed and the action was driven by administrative exigency rather than misconduct, is treated as a non-punitive service reversion and not a reduction in rank. After reorganisation, the State could act on a provisional integrated seniority list and was not confined to regionwise promotions or reversions. Rule 2(c) of the Mysore Seniority Rules was held inapplicable to invalidate the reversion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>