https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187398 A probationer is not deemed confirmed merely because the initial probation period expires where the governing rule allows extension and no confirmation order has been issued. Discharge for unsatisfactory performance, based on assessment of the probationer's overall record and suitability, is not stigmatic or punitive when it does not allege misconduct or guilt, so no disciplinary inquiry or hearing is required. An order dispensing with service remains valid when issued by the competent authority, and the omission to name the Governor does not by itself invalidate the action. The cessation of service was upheld as a valid discharge for unsatisfactory probationary service. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:20:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187398 A probationer is not deemed confirmed merely because the initial probation period expires where the governing rule allows extension and no confirmation order has been issued. Discharge for unsatisfactory performance, based on assessment of the probationer's overall record and suitability, is not stigmatic or punitive when it does not allege misconduct or guilt, so no disciplinary inquiry or hearing is required. An order dispensing with service remains valid when issued by the competent authority, and the omission to name the Governor does not by itself invalidate the action. The cessation of service was upheld as a valid discharge for unsatisfactory probationary service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187398