<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 829 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187392</link>
    <description>Termination of a probationer must be judged by substance, not form: where an enquiry is directed to establishing misconduct and the discharge rests on that finding, the order is punitive and attracts Article 311(2). A probationer does not gain permanent status merely by completing the probation period without a formal confirmation order. Para 541 of the U.P. Police Regulations also required notice of the specific complaints and an opportunity to show cause before discharge of a recruit found unlikely to make a good police officer. Because the termination was founded on a preliminary enquiry into alleged misconduct and no notice or explanation was given, the discharge was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:59:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 829 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187392</link>
      <description>Termination of a probationer must be judged by substance, not form: where an enquiry is directed to establishing misconduct and the discharge rests on that finding, the order is punitive and attracts Article 311(2). A probationer does not gain permanent status merely by completing the probation period without a formal confirmation order. Para 541 of the U.P. Police Regulations also required notice of the specific complaints and an opportunity to show cause before discharge of a recruit found unlikely to make a good police officer. Because the termination was founded on a preliminary enquiry into alleged misconduct and no notice or explanation was given, the discharge was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>