<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187389</link>
    <description>The appeals against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 were allowed. The penalties were overturned by the ITAT as the claims made by the assessee, although not sustainable in law, were not found to be incorrect or false. The ITAT relied on the decision in CIT v. Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. to emphasize that making unsustainable claims does not automatically attract penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187389</link>
      <description>The appeals against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 were allowed. The penalties were overturned by the ITAT as the claims made by the assessee, although not sustainable in law, were not found to be incorrect or false. The ITAT relied on the decision in CIT v. Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. to emphasize that making unsustainable claims does not automatically attract penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>