<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187385</link>
    <description>A probationary judicial officer&#039;s termination was held unsustainable because it rested on complaints, an inquiry report that did not record a definite finding of misconduct, and other material that was either unsubstantiated or later found unwarranted. The court noted that vague, motivated, or unproved allegations cannot justify dispensing with the services of a probationer in judicial service, particularly where the officer&#039;s judicial orders had been upheld on merits. If adverse action was contemplated, the proper course was disciplinary proceedings with an opportunity to explain. The termination order was set aside, with reinstatement, continuity of service, back wages, and consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187385</link>
      <description>A probationary judicial officer&#039;s termination was held unsustainable because it rested on complaints, an inquiry report that did not record a definite finding of misconduct, and other material that was either unsubstantiated or later found unwarranted. The court noted that vague, motivated, or unproved allegations cannot justify dispensing with the services of a probationer in judicial service, particularly where the officer&#039;s judicial orders had been upheld on merits. If adverse action was contemplated, the proper course was disciplinary proceedings with an opportunity to explain. The termination order was set aside, with reinstatement, continuity of service, back wages, and consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>