https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187380 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty liability should be discharged under the Compounded Levy Scheme if goods covered by the scheme predominate over others. Citing previous Tribunal decisions and considering the predominance of goods under the Compounded Levy Scheme by the appellant, the Tribunal found the duty paid under the scheme appropriate. The impugned order demanding duty under the normal scheme was set aside, emphasizing the importance of determining duty liability based on the predominance of goods covered by the Compounded Levy Scheme in cases involving multiple types of goods. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:50:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187380 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty liability should be discharged under the Compounded Levy Scheme if goods covered by the scheme predominate over others. Citing previous Tribunal decisions and considering the predominance of goods under the Compounded Levy Scheme by the appellant, the Tribunal found the duty paid under the scheme appropriate. The impugned order demanding duty under the normal scheme was set aside, emphasizing the importance of determining duty liability based on the predominance of goods covered by the Compounded Levy Scheme in cases involving multiple types of goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187380