https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187360 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the trial court's decree. The plaintiffs successfully established their title to the property through various documents, while the defendant's claim of title was unsupported by evidence. The defendant's assertion of adverse possession was deemed unproven due to inconsistencies and lack of continuous possession evidence. Consequently, the plaintiffs were declared rightful owners of the property and granted possession, with the defendant directed to deliver possession and pay costs. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:24:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187360 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the trial court's decree. The plaintiffs successfully established their title to the property through various documents, while the defendant's claim of title was unsupported by evidence. The defendant's assertion of adverse possession was deemed unproven due to inconsistencies and lack of continuous possession evidence. Consequently, the plaintiffs were declared rightful owners of the property and granted possession, with the defendant directed to deliver possession and pay costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187360