<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (1) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187355</link>
    <description>Commission payable to employees at a fixed percentage of profits could not be reduced by a rigid requirement that excess profits tax be deducted first. The taxing authority had to apply the statutory test of commercial reasonableness and business necessity, considering the contract, services rendered, past practice, and surrounding business conditions. A payment was not to be treated as unreasonable or unnecessary merely because it was calculated without first deducting excess profits tax. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s commission claim was preserved and the disallowance based solely on the deduction-first approach was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (1) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187355</link>
      <description>Commission payable to employees at a fixed percentage of profits could not be reduced by a rigid requirement that excess profits tax be deducted first. The taxing authority had to apply the statutory test of commercial reasonableness and business necessity, considering the contract, services rendered, past practice, and surrounding business conditions. A payment was not to be treated as unreasonable or unnecessary merely because it was calculated without first deducting excess profits tax. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s commission claim was preserved and the disallowance based solely on the deduction-first approach was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>