<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1293 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187352</link>
    <description>A clarification increasing tax on paper-based decorative laminated sheets from 10% to 16% under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act could not operate retrospectively to disturb completed assessments because the tax entries were not amended and no clear legislative intent authorised the enhanced rate. Classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act could not be mechanically imported into the State sales tax scheme. Applying the strict construction of taxing provisions, any ambiguity in the rate entry had to be resolved in favour of the assessee. The clarification was therefore invalid, and the consequential reassessment notices and orders based on it were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1293 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187352</link>
      <description>A clarification increasing tax on paper-based decorative laminated sheets from 10% to 16% under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act could not operate retrospectively to disturb completed assessments because the tax entries were not amended and no clear legislative intent authorised the enhanced rate. Classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act could not be mechanically imported into the State sales tax scheme. Applying the strict construction of taxing provisions, any ambiguity in the rate entry had to be resolved in favour of the assessee. The clarification was therefore invalid, and the consequential reassessment notices and orders based on it were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>