<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 656 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333636</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing fair procedures, adherence to statutory provisions, and timely consideration of refund claims. The appellant&#039;s concerns regarding the interpretation of exemption for commission agents, taxability of brokerage of mutual funds, procedural irregularities in refund claim rejection, violation of natural justice principles, and application of statutory provisions were addressed, directing authorities to reconsider the refund application on merit without delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:54:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 656 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333636</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing fair procedures, adherence to statutory provisions, and timely consideration of refund claims. The appellant&#039;s concerns regarding the interpretation of exemption for commission agents, taxability of brokerage of mutual funds, procedural irregularities in refund claim rejection, violation of natural justice principles, and application of statutory provisions were addressed, directing authorities to reconsider the refund application on merit without delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>