<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 655 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333635</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai set aside the tax demands for services provided before 01/06/2007, ruling that no service tax was payable under &#039;commercial or industrial construction service&#039; if operating under a works contract. Post 01/06/2007, the appellant was directed to pay service tax under &#039;works contract service&#039; within 30 days, with the option to avail relief under the composition scheme. No penalty was imposed on the appellant due to their genuine belief about the non-taxability of their services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:54:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 655 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333635</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai set aside the tax demands for services provided before 01/06/2007, ruling that no service tax was payable under &#039;commercial or industrial construction service&#039; if operating under a works contract. Post 01/06/2007, the appellant was directed to pay service tax under &#039;works contract service&#039; within 30 days, with the option to avail relief under the composition scheme. No penalty was imposed on the appellant due to their genuine belief about the non-taxability of their services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>