https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333632 The case involved appeals by the Revenue against orders setting aside demands confirmed by an adjudication order regarding cenvat credit on inputs for plastic mould manufacturers. CESTAT Chandigarh found that while some invoices were supported by evidence of goods receipt, specific instances of vehicles incapable of transporting the goods led to the denial of cenvat credit. The judgment denied cenvat credit for certain vehicle invoices, confirmed duty demands, imposed interest, and penalties on Novice Polymers. The appeal against denying cenvat credit to Airvision India Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed, with cenvat credit allowed for them. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333632 The case involved appeals by the Revenue against orders setting aside demands confirmed by an adjudication order regarding cenvat credit on inputs for plastic mould manufacturers. CESTAT Chandigarh found that while some invoices were supported by evidence of goods receipt, specific instances of vehicles incapable of transporting the goods led to the denial of cenvat credit. The judgment denied cenvat credit for certain vehicle invoices, confirmed duty demands, imposed interest, and penalties on Novice Polymers. The appeal against denying cenvat credit to Airvision India Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed, with cenvat credit allowed for them. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333632