<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 644 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they and the trading company were not related persons under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the lack of mutuality of interest and commercial practices in their transactions. The Tribunal highlighted the relationships between the firms and legal criteria for determining related person status. As a result, the demand against the appellants was deemed unsustainable, and the impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 644 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they and the trading company were not related persons under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the lack of mutuality of interest and commercial practices in their transactions. The Tribunal highlighted the relationships between the firms and legal criteria for determining related person status. As a result, the demand against the appellants was deemed unsustainable, and the impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>