https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333620 Confidential non-injurious price working used in anti-dumping proceedings need not be disclosed in full where it forms part of Annexure III costing material, and no breach of natural justice arises on that basis. The injury and non-injurious price determination was upheld because the authority examined domestic production constraints, raw material disruption, best consumption norms, optimum capacity utilisation, and idle-time expenses while separately assessing the effect of dumped imports. The objection that landed imports and domestic sales were compared without proper bulk and non-bulk segregation failed because similar items were compared on the investigation data and no contrary evidence showed an improper mixed comparison. The anti-dumping findings were sustained and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333620 Confidential non-injurious price working used in anti-dumping proceedings need not be disclosed in full where it forms part of Annexure III costing material, and no breach of natural justice arises on that basis. The injury and non-injurious price determination was upheld because the authority examined domestic production constraints, raw material disruption, best consumption norms, optimum capacity utilisation, and idle-time expenses while separately assessing the effect of dumped imports. The objection that landed imports and domestic sales were compared without proper bulk and non-bulk segregation failed because similar items were compared on the investigation data and no contrary evidence showed an improper mixed comparison. The anti-dumping findings were sustained and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333620