<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 926 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the additions under Section 69C, allowing depreciation on leased assets, and directing the deletion of interest and surcharge. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 158BC without further discussion on general grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:39:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 926 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the additions under Section 69C, allowing depreciation on leased assets, and directing the deletion of interest and surcharge. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 158BC without further discussion on general grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>