<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1061 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187332</link>
    <description>Mandatory service of SARFAESI demand and possession notices was required before further enforcement, and notices issued after the borrower&#039;s death without proper prescribed service were treated as invalid, vitiating the measures. The writ petition was held maintainable despite the section 17 remedy because the challenge involved breach of mandatory procedure, natural justice, and article 300A. Serious irregularities in the auction process, including doubtful authorisation, third-party payments, and bid tampering, led to the sale and sale certificate being set aside; fraud defeated bona fide purchaser protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1061 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187332</link>
      <description>Mandatory service of SARFAESI demand and possession notices was required before further enforcement, and notices issued after the borrower&#039;s death without proper prescribed service were treated as invalid, vitiating the measures. The writ petition was held maintainable despite the section 17 remedy because the challenge involved breach of mandatory procedure, natural justice, and article 300A. Serious irregularities in the auction process, including doubtful authorisation, third-party payments, and bid tampering, led to the sale and sale certificate being set aside; fraud defeated bona fide purchaser protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>