<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the appellant&#039;s liability for short payment of service tax on gross billing, directing payment of outstanding amount with interest. Penalty under Section 78 was set aside due to lack of mala fide intention, while penalty under Section 76 was upheld as reasonable. The appellant&#039;s argument for waiver of penalties based on a later exemption notification for consumables was rejected. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s misinterpretation of legal provisions as the reason for the short payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the appellant&#039;s liability for short payment of service tax on gross billing, directing payment of outstanding amount with interest. Penalty under Section 78 was set aside due to lack of mala fide intention, while penalty under Section 76 was upheld as reasonable. The appellant&#039;s argument for waiver of penalties based on a later exemption notification for consumables was rejected. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s misinterpretation of legal provisions as the reason for the short payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>