https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187330 Land acquisition law does not require the State to acquire property already owned by it, and compensation is not payable merely because such land was wrongly treated as liable to acquisition. Any claim by a private party depends on a lawful tenancy or other enforceable interest displacing the State's title. The text also explains that a Tehsildar cannot validly recognise a tenancy without the confirmation required by the statutory scheme, so such a settlement is void. Revisional power under Section 38 B may apply to earlier orders once the provision is in force, and a void jurisdictional order can be corrected within a reasonable time after it comes to notice. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:47:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187330 Land acquisition law does not require the State to acquire property already owned by it, and compensation is not payable merely because such land was wrongly treated as liable to acquisition. Any claim by a private party depends on a lawful tenancy or other enforceable interest displacing the State's title. The text also explains that a Tehsildar cannot validly recognise a tenancy without the confirmation required by the statutory scheme, so such a settlement is void. Revisional power under Section 38 B may apply to earlier orders once the provision is in force, and a void jurisdictional order can be corrected within a reasonable time after it comes to notice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187330