<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333599</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside due to noted infirmities and lack of sanctity of law in the demand for tax payment. The detailed analysis addressed various legal aspects concerning the classification, liability, and compliance related to the service tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333599</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside due to noted infirmities and lack of sanctity of law in the demand for tax payment. The detailed analysis addressed various legal aspects concerning the classification, liability, and compliance related to the service tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>