<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 611 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333591</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case involving denial of cenvat credit on inputs received from a non-existent dealer. The tribunal held that without investigation at the manufacturer&#039;s end, cenvat credit cannot be denied, especially when the dealer was registered during the procurement of goods. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, set aside the impugned orders, and granted consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 611 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333591</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case involving denial of cenvat credit on inputs received from a non-existent dealer. The tribunal held that without investigation at the manufacturer&#039;s end, cenvat credit cannot be denied, especially when the dealer was registered during the procurement of goods. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, set aside the impugned orders, and granted consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>