<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 610 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the additive mixtures prepared by the assessee were not excisable products as they were not marketable. It also ruled that the NCCD exemption and Cenvat credit scheme applied, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. The show cause notices were deemed invalid due to lack of specific details. The Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals on 23.08.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 610 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the additive mixtures prepared by the assessee were not excisable products as they were not marketable. It also ruled that the NCCD exemption and Cenvat credit scheme applied, resulting in a revenue-neutral situation. The show cause notices were deemed invalid due to lack of specific details. The Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals on 23.08.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>