<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333588</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged the Revenue&#039;s allegations of improperly availing the concessional rate of duty under Notification 8/97-CE. The Original Authority&#039;s decision to demand payment and impose penalties was overturned due to the appellant&#039;s maintenance of separate accounts for imported and indigenous raw materials, supported by detailed documentation. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on circumstantial evidence and lack of proper verification were deemed inadequate, leading to the dismissal of the allegations. The appellant&#039;s detailed analysis and evidence led to the setting aside of the impugned order and the allowance of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333588</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged the Revenue&#039;s allegations of improperly availing the concessional rate of duty under Notification 8/97-CE. The Original Authority&#039;s decision to demand payment and impose penalties was overturned due to the appellant&#039;s maintenance of separate accounts for imported and indigenous raw materials, supported by detailed documentation. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on circumstantial evidence and lack of proper verification were deemed inadequate, leading to the dismissal of the allegations. The appellant&#039;s detailed analysis and evidence led to the setting aside of the impugned order and the allowance of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>