<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1005 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187320</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) cancelled the penalty u/s 271D imposed for contravention of section 269SS as the transactions were deemed bona fide and genuine family dealings without tax evasion intent. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the absence of typical loan or deposit conditions and citing precedents where similar family transactions were not penalized. Consequently, the penalty was rightly deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1005 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187320</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) cancelled the penalty u/s 271D imposed for contravention of section 269SS as the transactions were deemed bona fide and genuine family dealings without tax evasion intent. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the absence of typical loan or deposit conditions and citing precedents where similar family transactions were not penalized. Consequently, the penalty was rightly deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>