<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333587</link>
    <description>In countervailing duty investigations, where foreign producers, exporters, or the foreign government fail to cooperate or provide complete information, the Designated Authority may lawfully rely on the best available information and draw adverse inferences under the Rules. Here, the Authority had issued notices, sought data, and afforded opportunities for participation, but cooperation remained incomplete and on-site verification was not permitted. The Tribunal held that the Authority had examined subsidy, injury, causal link, volume and price effects, and public body issues within the framework of the Rules and Annexure I. The challenge to the countervailing duty levy failed, and the Authority&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333587</link>
      <description>In countervailing duty investigations, where foreign producers, exporters, or the foreign government fail to cooperate or provide complete information, the Designated Authority may lawfully rely on the best available information and draw adverse inferences under the Rules. Here, the Authority had issued notices, sought data, and afforded opportunities for participation, but cooperation remained incomplete and on-site verification was not permitted. The Tribunal held that the Authority had examined subsidy, injury, causal link, volume and price effects, and public body issues within the framework of the Rules and Annexure I. The challenge to the countervailing duty levy failed, and the Authority&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>