https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333586 In anti-dumping proceedings, material injury is not to be assessed only by comparing the domestic industry's net sales realisation with the non-injurious price. The Tribunal stated that price effects of dumped imports must also be examined through price suppression and price depression. Here, the final findings recorded price suppression, a decline in per unit profits during the injury period, and a landed price below the non-injurious price. On that basis, the challenge to the anti-dumping duty failed, the findings of injury were upheld, and the duty remained undisturbed. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333586 In anti-dumping proceedings, material injury is not to be assessed only by comparing the domestic industry's net sales realisation with the non-injurious price. The Tribunal stated that price effects of dumped imports must also be examined through price suppression and price depression. Here, the final findings recorded price suppression, a decline in per unit profits during the injury period, and a landed price below the non-injurious price. On that basis, the challenge to the anti-dumping duty failed, the findings of injury were upheld, and the duty remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333586