<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1326 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the appeal due to the lack of valid reasons for the delay. The judgment emphasizes the importance of complying with procedural requirements, such as mandatory deposits, when filing appeals, stating that delays resulting from fund arrangement difficulties may not warrant condonation. It highlights the necessity of assessing each delay request based on the individual circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1326 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application and dismissed the appeal due to the lack of valid reasons for the delay. The judgment emphasizes the importance of complying with procedural requirements, such as mandatory deposits, when filing appeals, stating that delays resulting from fund arrangement difficulties may not warrant condonation. It highlights the necessity of assessing each delay request based on the individual circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>