<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 583 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment based on a change of opinion was unjustified. The addition of undisclosed investment in excess stock during reassessment was deemed unwarranted as the Assessing Officer had already considered the same information during the original assessment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(Appeals) order and quashing the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 583 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment based on a change of opinion was unjustified. The addition of undisclosed investment in excess stock during reassessment was deemed unwarranted as the Assessing Officer had already considered the same information during the original assessment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(Appeals) order and quashing the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>