<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 581 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the refund of service tax paid on services used for export purposes, including THC charges, bill of loading charges, and CHA services. Refunds were granted based on precedents supporting admissibility, accepting debit notes for refund claims, and dismissing challenges regarding proof of payment. The judgment remanded all appeals for eligible refunds, emphasizing a fair and consistent application of legal principles in determining refund entitlement for export-related services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 581 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the refund of service tax paid on services used for export purposes, including THC charges, bill of loading charges, and CHA services. Refunds were granted based on precedents supporting admissibility, accepting debit notes for refund claims, and dismissing challenges regarding proof of payment. The judgment remanded all appeals for eligible refunds, emphasizing a fair and consistent application of legal principles in determining refund entitlement for export-related services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>