<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333560</link>
    <description>The appellant withdrew the challenge against the Service Tax demand based on the increased rate of duty, amounting to Rs. 325, due to lack of jurisdiction. The denial of credit for Service Tax paid on Chartered Accountant and telephone services, totaling Rs. 17,423, was contested. The appellant did not challenge the denial of credit for telephone services but contested the denial for Chartered Accountant services. The lack of evidence for payment of Chartered Accountant services led to a remand for further examination to verify the documents supporting the credit claim. The appeal was disposed of with instructions to submit all necessary evidence for re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333560</link>
      <description>The appellant withdrew the challenge against the Service Tax demand based on the increased rate of duty, amounting to Rs. 325, due to lack of jurisdiction. The denial of credit for Service Tax paid on Chartered Accountant and telephone services, totaling Rs. 17,423, was contested. The appellant did not challenge the denial of credit for telephone services but contested the denial for Chartered Accountant services. The lack of evidence for payment of Chartered Accountant services led to a remand for further examination to verify the documents supporting the credit claim. The appeal was disposed of with instructions to submit all necessary evidence for re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>