<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 579 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order regarding service tax on works contract services. The Commissioner (A) had set aside the demand for service tax, citing that the services provided fell under the works contract category, which was not taxable before 01.06.2007. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing a Supreme Court precedent that services falling under works contracts could not be taxed prior to the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 579 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order regarding service tax on works contract services. The Commissioner (A) had set aside the demand for service tax, citing that the services provided fell under the works contract category, which was not taxable before 01.06.2007. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing a Supreme Court precedent that services falling under works contracts could not be taxed prior to the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>