<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333557</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the tax rate should be determined based on the date the service was provided rather than the date of tax payment. The lack of clarity in the show cause notice regarding the period of service resulted in a denial of natural justice. Consequently, the orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 577 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333557</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the tax rate should be determined based on the date the service was provided rather than the date of tax payment. The lack of clarity in the show cause notice regarding the period of service resulted in a denial of natural justice. Consequently, the orders were set aside, and both appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>