<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 573 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333553</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision that the respondents were entitled to exemption as a Small Scale Industry (SSI) unit under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E., despite using registered trademarks on procured products. The Court found the Department&#039;s failure to substantiate claims regarding the trademarks and affirmed the SSI unit&#039;s eligibility for exemption. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of meeting eligibility criteria for exemptions under the relevant regulations. The Court&#039;s judgment provided a detailed analysis of the case&#039;s procedural and substantive aspects, clarifying the grounds for appeal before the Supreme Court and the limitations on appellate jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 573 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333553</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision that the respondents were entitled to exemption as a Small Scale Industry (SSI) unit under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E., despite using registered trademarks on procured products. The Court found the Department&#039;s failure to substantiate claims regarding the trademarks and affirmed the SSI unit&#039;s eligibility for exemption. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of meeting eligibility criteria for exemptions under the relevant regulations. The Court&#039;s judgment provided a detailed analysis of the case&#039;s procedural and substantive aspects, clarifying the grounds for appeal before the Supreme Court and the limitations on appellate jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>