<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 572 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333552</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition seeking modification of an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which required the petitioner to deposit an additional sum for an appeal to remain stayed. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the initial direction and the lack of convincing reasons for not making the deposit earlier precluded them from seeking modification based on subsequent references to other judgments. Emphasizing the importance of not revisiting admission orders on weak grounds, the Court found the petition unmeritorious and ordered the parties to receive certified copies of the order upon compliance with formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 572 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333552</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition seeking modification of an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which required the petitioner to deposit an additional sum for an appeal to remain stayed. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the initial direction and the lack of convincing reasons for not making the deposit earlier precluded them from seeking modification based on subsequent references to other judgments. Emphasizing the importance of not revisiting admission orders on weak grounds, the Court found the petition unmeritorious and ordered the parties to receive certified copies of the order upon compliance with formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>