<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 862 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187302</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act cannot be initiated on a mere change of opinion by a successor Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the reassessment attempt was based only on a fresh view of the original assessment, and applied the settled Full Bench principle that such a change does not satisfy section 147. On that basis, the appeal raised no substantial question of law and was held not maintainable on the proposed issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 862 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187302</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act cannot be initiated on a mere change of opinion by a successor Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the reassessment attempt was based only on a fresh view of the original assessment, and applied the settled Full Bench principle that such a change does not satisfy section 147. On that basis, the appeal raised no substantial question of law and was held not maintainable on the proposed issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>