https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300 Parliament's scheme under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 was treated as a complete code for establishing new medical colleges, so the Tamil Nadu requirement of prior State Government permission under the State Act was repugnant and could not operate in that field. The State could not refuse an essentiality certificate on the basis of a general policy against private trusts starting medical colleges, because the certificate was only meant to assess desirability and feasibility at the proposed location. The Central Government was required to consider the application on its merits without treating State permission or an essentiality certificate as a veto. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300 Parliament's scheme under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 was treated as a complete code for establishing new medical colleges, so the Tamil Nadu requirement of prior State Government permission under the State Act was repugnant and could not operate in that field. The State could not refuse an essentiality certificate on the basis of a general policy against private trusts starting medical colleges, because the certificate was only meant to assess desirability and feasibility at the proposed location. The Central Government was required to consider the application on its merits without treating State permission or an essentiality certificate as a veto. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300