https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300 The Supreme Court held that prior permission from the State Government was not necessary for establishing a medical college, as Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, requiring permission from the Central Government, prevails over State legislation. The Court also ruled that the State Government cannot refuse an essentiality certificate based on policy grounds, as this authority now rests with the Central Government. The Court allowed the appeals, directing the Central Government to consider the Trust's application for establishing a medical college without requiring the State Government's essentiality certificate, and instructed the University to consider the affiliation without State Government permission. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300 The Supreme Court held that prior permission from the State Government was not necessary for establishing a medical college, as Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, requiring permission from the Central Government, prevails over State legislation. The Court also ruled that the State Government cannot refuse an essentiality certificate based on policy grounds, as this authority now rests with the Central Government. The Court allowed the appeals, directing the Central Government to consider the Trust's application for establishing a medical college without requiring the State Government's essentiality certificate, and instructed the University to consider the affiliation without State Government permission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187300