https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333545 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dated 11th February, 2014, and upheld the conditions imposed by the Policy Relaxation Committee. The court found that the imposition of conditions was justified based on genuine hardship and adverse impact on trade. The petitioners' request for clubbing authorizations was partially granted with the condition that only exports made within 48 months from the date of the earliest authorization would be considered. The court emphasized that policy relaxation is discretionary and must be granted on a case-by-case basis, considering genuine hardship and trade impact. The court also held that the principles of natural justice were followed in the proceedings. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333545 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dated 11th February, 2014, and upheld the conditions imposed by the Policy Relaxation Committee. The court found that the imposition of conditions was justified based on genuine hardship and adverse impact on trade. The petitioners' request for clubbing authorizations was partially granted with the condition that only exports made within 48 months from the date of the earliest authorization would be considered. The court emphasized that policy relaxation is discretionary and must be granted on a case-by-case basis, considering genuine hardship and trade impact. The court also held that the principles of natural justice were followed in the proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333545