<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions related to loans and interest payments and providing relief for unexplained jewellery. It emphasized that income disclosed in regular books of account and filed under section 139(4) cannot be treated as undisclosed income for the block period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions related to loans and interest payments and providing relief for unexplained jewellery. It emphasized that income disclosed in regular books of account and filed under section 139(4) cannot be treated as undisclosed income for the block period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>